Fandom (2004-2017): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
#Its staff back then were actually fair, helpful, and not overly focused on trying to be "politically correct".
#Its staff back then were actually fair, helpful, and not overly focused on trying to be "politically correct".
#Instead of trying to be "the mainstream source for fans to share their passions" (though that's not necessarily a bad thing), it focused on providing wikis for anyone.
#Instead of trying to be "the mainstream source for fans to share their passions" (though that's not necessarily a bad thing), it focused on providing wikis for anyone.
#The wikis hosted on the site are helpful, community-driven resources such as [[Encyclopedia SpongeBobia]].
#The wikis hosted on the site are helpful, community-driven resources such as [[Encyclopedia SpongeBobia]],UVApedia,[https://millionaire.fandom.com/wiki/Welcome WWTBAM wiki], the [https://siivagunner.fandom.com/wiki/SiIvaGunner_Wiki Silvagunner wiki], [https://hero.fandom.com/wiki/Heroes_Wiki Heroes Wiki], [https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page Villains Wiki], Five nights at Freddy's wiki,Incredibox wiki,SpongeBob Fanon Wiki,Cuphead wiki,The Binding of Isaac wiki,[https://nickelodeon.fandom.com/wiki/Nickelodeon_Wiki Nickipedia], [https://nickstory.fandom.com/wiki/Nickstory_Wiki Nickstory Archives], [https://roblox.fandom.com/wiki/Roblox_Wiki Roblox Wiki], Poppy Playtime wiki and [https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Logopedia Logopedia].
#If you wanted to find something about a show, movie, game, etc. Chances are, they can be found on Fandom.
#If you wanted to find something about a show, movie, game, etc. Chances are, they can be found on Fandom.


== Toxic Fandom Qualities ==
== Toxic Fandom Qualities ==
#Ever since Jon Miller acquired Fandom in February 2018, it experienced a significant decline in quality.
#[https://rottenwebsites.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Fandom_(2018-present) Ever since Jon Miller acquired Fandom in February 2018, it experienced a significant decline in quality.]
#There were still a few bad wikis back then (for example, the Scary Logos Wiki, though it has improved dramatically after 2020, was filled with spam categories and low-quality pages).
#There were still a few bad wikis back then (for example, the Scary Logos Wiki, though it has improved dramatically after 2020, was filled with spam categories and low-quality pages).