Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 46:

#Some of the pages have some uncensored nudity and/or gore, which can make it inappropriate or scary for some audiences/readers especially the minors.

##To make things worse, there's no warning about these NSFW and NSFL images.

#Just like Fandom, if a user gets unfairly blocked without reasoning by a corrupt admin and if the user tries to report the corruptive admin, they usually side with the corrupt admin without giving it a second thought.

#If you are indefinitely blocked, there is a "standard offer" that requires users to wait 6 months before appealing, although it's likely to make sure that users reflect on their past actions.

#*This can make appealing hard at times, as some people may need Wikipedia for a specific thing before 6 months, and admins may choose to decline a unblock request or appeal.

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 #Some of the pages have some uncensored nudity and/or gore, which can make it inappropriate or scary for some audiences/readers especially the minors.
 ##To make things worse, there's no warning about these NSFW and NSFL images.
+#Just like Fandom, if a user gets unfairly blocked without reasoning by a corrupt admin and if the user tries to report the corruptive admin, they usually side with the corrupt admin without giving it a second thought.
 #If you are indefinitely blocked, there is a "standard offer" that requires users to wait 6 months before appealing, although it's likely to make sure that users reflect on their past actions.
 #*This can make appealing hard at times, as some people may need Wikipedia for a specific thing before 6 months, and admins may choose to decline a unblock request or appeal.